| |
|
Nelson analysis in weight % of metal content
|
|
REPORT OF QUALITATIVE SPECTROGRAPHIC EXAMINATION
ELEMENT
APPROXIMATE PERCENTAGE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Samples |
A |
B |
Samples |
A |
B |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Boron |
2.0 |
2.0 |
Vanadium |
0.006 |
0.01 |
|
Silicon Major Constituent |
|
|
Copper |
0.04 |
0.08 |
|
Aluminum |
0.4 |
0.4 |
Sodium |
0.4 |
1.0 |
|
Manganese |
0.02 |
0.02 |
Titanium |
0.01 |
0.01 |
|
Magnesium |
0.06 |
0.06 |
Nickel |
0.2 |
0.4 |
|
Iron |
1.0 |
2.0 |
Potassium |
1.0 |
1.0 |
|
Calcium |
0.6 |
0.4 |
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
To:
Edgar E. Cayce
LEDOUX & COMPANY, Inc. [signed]
A. F. Larkin Spectrographic Analysis of Carbon
Ash
by Ledoux & Co. 359 Alfred ave.
Teaneck N.J., This sample submitted by
Niels Troost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Silicon................ |
High |
Copper.................. |
Low |
Vanadium............ |
Trace |
|
Iron..................... |
Medium |
Arsenic................. |
Trace-Low |
Lead..................... |
Trace-Low |
|
Sodium............... |
Medium-High |
Magnesium.......... |
Trace |
Chromium............ |
Trace |
|
Aluminum.......... |
Medium |
Manganese.......... |
Trace |
Barium.................. |
|
|
Boron................. |
Low |
Nickel.................... |
Trace |
Cobalt................... |
|
|
Calcium............. |
Low |
Titanium................ |
Trace |
Tin........................ |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ledoux Analysis is based on
following:
High
10-100% Medium 1-10% Low 0.1-1% Trace less that
0.1% Spectrographic Analysis of
Carbon Ash by Nelson. This
sample collected by Elliot Nelson, 139-60 85th
Dr., Jamaica 35 N.Y. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potassium.......... |
60.0 |
Calcium.................... |
0.6 |
Vanadium............ |
0.07 |
|
Silicon................ |
30.0 |
Copper.................... |
0.05 |
Lead..................... |
0.04 |
|
Iron..................... |
7.0 |
Magnesium............. |
0.4 |
Chromium............ |
0.02 |
|
Sodium............... |
1.0 |
Manganese............. |
0.2 |
Molybdenum....... |
0.003 |
|
Aluminum.......... |
0.3 |
Nickel....................... |
0.1 |
Strontium.............. |
0.2 |
|
Boron................. |
0.6 |
Titanium.................. |
0.08 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUMMARY:
Is Carbon 60 the same form of
carbon that Edgar Cayce described in a trance state over 70
years ago? The similarities between what he described and what
we know as Fullerene (Carbon-60) seem to be more than
coincidental.
Ÿ
Carbon
60 is made the same way Mr. Cayce specified Carbon Ash was to be
made. The compound forms at the pressure that Mr. Cayce said it
would. The method for making the ash as he described is
identical to the Kratschmer-Huffman method. When a sample of
Carbon Ash, made and collected exactly as Mr. Cayce instructed, was tested by a local laboratory,
it did contain the Fullerene known as Carbon 60.
Ÿ
Carbon
60 has the same chemical properties Mr. Cayce described. The
molecule attracts oxygen and releases it when exposed to
specific frequencies of light. It is a new form of carbon as
Cayce described. The Cayce / Kratschmer-Huffman method of
producing fullerenes is the best method of producing fullerene
oxides that contain up to five oxygen atoms for each atom of
Carbon 60.
Ÿ
Carbon
60 and Cayce’s Carbon Ash are both photodynamic and have the
same light sensitive properties. Both molecules are specifically
excited by the frequencies of green and ultra violet and
are also boosted 40%by a mixture of green and infra-red
frequencies.
Both of the lamps and filter combinations Mr. Cayce suggested to
use with the Carbon Ash specifically produce the
frequencies necessary to excite Carbon 60.
|
.jpg)
